I am preparing what is becoming a report on what some call the new media as it applies to micro blogging. Twitter is the big buzz and this video covers the absolutely ridiculous side of tweeting. BTW Follow me at http://twitter.com/timokeefe
This is the non profitable side of Tweeting. My forthcoming reports explore the downside and the profit potential for Realtors and Mortgage Pros. I believe there is definitely possibility for the more general markets.
Not so sure for Realtors and Mortgage Pros. Watcha think?
Although I suppose if you engage the fictional character in this video into a conversation you might be able to sell her a house.
I am deeply conflicted on this as my biggest concern is if your targeted market is actually on Twitter, and if they are, are they interested in real estate? I have not seen anything to prove to me that it works. I have some interesting relevations forthcoming.

Twitter is a great social media tool / platform, but I think there are a few questions that I'm sure you are addressing.
1. Will Twitter be around in 18 months? It's experiencing well-documented scaling issues.
2. Are real estate buyers on Twitter? Do they want to receive real-estate related contacts and information via Twitter?
3. What kinds of information can be communicated via Twitter?
Definitely looking forward to your report.
Posted by: Adam | July 07, 2008 at 07:26 AM
I like to think of Twitter as AIM Away Messages on steroids. Twitter does offer an opportunity to drive some traffic to a blog, but as a means of communication for realtors and their consumers, I don't think it will serve as a very effective medium.
To offer insight on Adam's comments:
1. I still think Twitter will be around in 18 months... the scaling issues have been there all along, and no one really seems to mind.
2. Real estate buyers are definitely on Twitter (as are agents), but I would offer that while using Twitter, they are not necessarily looking for real estate information. They are there to socialize.
3. Blog posts about properties and promotion new properties in the MLS would be a great way for agents to use Twitter, but use it as a brand awareness channel, not a direct response channel.
Posted by: J. Bentz | July 08, 2008 at 11:45 AM
The big looming questions for me are:
1. Loyalty-already there has been somewhat of a migration from Twitter to other similar channels.
2. The AIM affect as you say. Like the above video exagerates, this is in some way adult Instant Messaging. With all the sophomoric conversations.
3.Is there business? That remains to be seen as I too believe the buyers and sellers are on Twitter as really everyone is a prospect.
But the skill is in entering the conversation without being the used car salesmen which frankly most agents simply are either unable to or unwilling to do. I say that with all respect but some of the commentary I get is so poorly constructed and transparent in its attempt to siphon off traffic. If just a little thought and a little of the commenters genius was shared they would get the desired traffic they want.
Will Twitter last who knows as there seems to be an unnatural tolerance for unprofitable ventures stemming from the Stillnone Valley.
Posted by: Tim O'Keefe | July 08, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Adam-
You're dead on with your "aim on steroids" call. I'm a little younger than most SEO types (24!) and I find twitter the least painful and easy to set up which I think is partially why its been such a big hit with the older, "linkedin" crowd. I can also tell you that my friends aren't using it nearly as much as facebook or myspace, the younger set preferring to just text instead of twtter.
Posted by: Real Estate Raj | July 08, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Thanks. I will look into twitter.
Aloha,
Keahi
Posted by: Keahi Pelayo | July 08, 2008 at 01:55 PM
Hi and thanks for sharing i will also look into twitter.
Posted by: Städ | July 08, 2008 at 03:55 PM